<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blood molecules preserved for millions of years in abdomen of fossil mosquito</title>
	<atom:link href="http://smithsonianscience.org/2013/10/blood-molecules-preserved-for-millions-of-years-in-abdomen-of-fossil-mosquito/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://smithsonianscience.org/2013/10/blood-molecules-preserved-for-millions-of-years-in-abdomen-of-fossil-mosquito/</link>
	<description>News about the Smithsonian’s research in the fields of anthropology, astrophysics, conservation biology, geology, materials science, paleontology, zoology, and global climate change.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 08:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark_2674</title>
		<link>http://smithsonianscience.org/2013/10/blood-molecules-preserved-for-millions-of-years-in-abdomen-of-fossil-mosquito/#comment-25496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark_2674]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Feb 2014 02:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smithsonianscience.org/?p=28528#comment-25496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Didn&#039;t even look for DNA???&quot;  Were they afraid they would find some (in which case it would presumably prove ICR claims of being only a few thousand years old).  Just saying, if they wanted to shut creationist up, they could  just conduct an exhaustive  search for DNA in the sample, and say conclusively there wasn&#039;t any.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Didn&#8217;t even look for DNA???&#8221;  Were they afraid they would find some (in which case it would presumably prove ICR claims of being only a few thousand years old).  Just saying, if they wanted to shut creationist up, they could  just conduct an exhaustive  search for DNA in the sample, and say conclusively there wasn&#8217;t any.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Bump</title>
		<link>http://smithsonianscience.org/2013/10/blood-molecules-preserved-for-millions-of-years-in-abdomen-of-fossil-mosquito/#comment-25308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Bump]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 21:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smithsonianscience.org/?p=28528#comment-25308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daniel, C14 is radioactive and decays fairly rapidly. It was not used to provide the date for this fossil. The real question is, How is this possible when complex organic molecules break down in just thousands of years under all known conditions? Is it safe to assume that the conditions that preserved this fossil could do so to this degree for millions of years, or is it finally time we start asking if there is something very wrong with the assumptions or application of the dating methods that have been used?
 
BTW, here&#039;s another case or two of amazing ancient traces: http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/10/16/a-nervous-system-from-half-a-billion-years-ago/
    Not Exactly Rocket Science:
 A Nervous System From Half A Billion Years Ago
by Ed Yong]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel, C14 is radioactive and decays fairly rapidly. It was not used to provide the date for this fossil. The real question is, How is this possible when complex organic molecules break down in just thousands of years under all known conditions? Is it safe to assume that the conditions that preserved this fossil could do so to this degree for millions of years, or is it finally time we start asking if there is something very wrong with the assumptions or application of the dating methods that have been used?</p>
<p>BTW, here&#8217;s another case or two of amazing ancient traces: <a href="http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/10/16/a-nervous-system-from-half-a-billion-years-ago/" rel="nofollow">http://phenomena.nationalgeographic.com/2013/10/16/a-nervous-system-from-half-a-billion-years-ago/</a><br />
    Not Exactly Rocket Science:<br />
 A Nervous System From Half A Billion Years Ago<br />
by Ed Yong</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Enyart</title>
		<link>http://smithsonianscience.org/2013/10/blood-molecules-preserved-for-millions-of-years-in-abdomen-of-fossil-mosquito/#comment-25305</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Enyart]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smithsonianscience.org/?p=28528#comment-25305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“This... represents the first clear evidence that some organic molecules can 
be preserved in a fossil of this [46mya] age,” Greenwalt explains. Wow, Greenwalt is a bit behind on his reading :)  A good start for him is dinosaursofttissue com, listing a dozen peer-reviewed papers, in Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, etc., on dino soft tissue, and dozens of other papers going back, ALLEGEDLY, all the way to 350 Mya in crinoids :) !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“This&#8230; represents the first clear evidence that some organic molecules can<br />
be preserved in a fossil of this [46mya] age,” Greenwalt explains. Wow, Greenwalt is a bit behind on his reading <img src="http://smithsonianscience.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" />  A good start for him is dinosaursofttissue com, listing a dozen peer-reviewed papers, in Nature, Science, PNAS, PLoS One, etc., on dino soft tissue, and dozens of other papers going back, ALLEGEDLY, all the way to 350 Mya in crinoids <img src="http://smithsonianscience.org/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /> !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://smithsonianscience.org/2013/10/blood-molecules-preserved-for-millions-of-years-in-abdomen-of-fossil-mosquito/#comment-25304</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://smithsonianscience.org/?p=28528#comment-25304</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is this possible if the half life of carbon14 is 5703 years?

I assume that the fossil is not a fossil at all. As the term fossilization means that the original biological material is replaced with minerals.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is this possible if the half life of carbon14 is 5703 years?</p>
<p>I assume that the fossil is not a fossil at all. As the term fossilization means that the original biological material is replaced with minerals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
