Tucked into the wooded landscape and rolling hills of the Smithsonian Environmental Research Center in Edgewater, Md., is a new forest.
Six months ago, a cornfield covered this terrain. Today, it is the BiodiversiTree project, with 24,000 stick-like year-old trees. By next spring, if everything goes as planned, 35,000 trees will cover 10 fields.
“We’re trying to figure out whether or not an ecosystem with lots of species functions any better or worse than an ecosystem with only a few species,” said senior scientist John Parker, who developed the plan.
Prior smaller-scale research suggests diversity matters because it reduces pests and makes trees healthier. But Parker wondered if he would find the same result if he looked at an entire forest over the long-term.
Sum of the parts
The 100-year BiodiversiTree project calls for 125 plots with one, four or 12 species each. Marked off in the field by tall white poles, Parker says each provides a unique research opportunity.
“In many cases what we are seeing is a decline in native species, and then the question is, well, does that mean anything?” Parker said. “Can other species fill that role of that missing species or does each species do something a little bit different such that the sum of the parts is more than the whole?”
While BiodiversiTree has a century to supply the answers, studies are beginning now. The area sits beside forested land and near a stream that flows into the Chesapeake Bay, the nation’s largest estuary and a valuable natural resource that provides fresh drinking water for millions of people.
“One of the big concerns over the last half century or so is that water quality in the Chesapeake Bay is getting worse,” Parker said.
That problem is exacerbated by nutrient runoff from decades of farming in the mid-Atlantic region.
“What our study is doing is we take those 35 years of pre-data,” Parker said. “We put a forest in. Now we can compare what happens when you had corn versus what happens when you have a native forest planted in this diverse arrangement. If we plant even more of that watershed with forest, do we take out even more of those nutrients?”
Smithsonian Research Fellow Susan Cook-Patton, who helped design BiodiversiTree, gathers leaf samples with intern Emily Dubois.
“We are interested in how the insects are eating the leaves now,” Cook-Patton said. “And we are also looking at traits that the leaves have to see if there are some types of species that have things that make the leaves less palatable, like if they are really tough or if they are really fuzzy those types of leaves will get less consumed by insects.”
“If you do not have a baseline, you really do not know what you have lost or gained in the future,” she said. “So if you can have a snapshot in time and move forward from there, you can actually learn a lot more than if we keep doing an experiment in two years, in 10 more years in the future we do another one short term experiment. So, scientifically, that’s incredible.”Physically, it is incredible, too. Over the course of five weeks, about 100 volunteers helped Parker and his staff plant the 24,000 trees. Phil Bishop, who managed a computer center before he retired, figures he single-handedly planted 500 or 600 of them. While his knees are a bit weary, he is glad to help out.
“I decided that I could make a contribution here, and that is really what I wanted to do was to be part of a program,” Bishop said. “I will not see any results out of this more than likely, given my age and everything else.”
But, he adds, volunteering is good for the soul and in the case of BiodiversiTree, good for the soil, too.–By Rosanne Skirble, Voice of America
You might also like:
- Smithsonian scientists launch 100-year project to examine the future of forests
- Center for Tropical Forest Science receives grant to study diversity of tree communities
- Loss of animals spells doom for diversity of rainforest trees
- Heavyweight trees are forest champs at sequestering carbon
- Smithsonian research plot burns in Yosemite fires